L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Printz v. United States
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Washington v. Davis
- INS v. Chadha
- Texas v. Johnson
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Reno v. Condon
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Loving v. Virginia
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Bush v. Gore
- Roe v. Wade
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Alden v. Maine
- Nixon v. United States
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Korematsu v. United States
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Miller v. California
- Romer v. Evans
- United States v. Morrison
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- United States v. Windsor
- McCullen v. Coakley
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Ex Parte Young
- Powell v. McCormack
- Champion v. Ames
- Baker v. Carr
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Civil Rights Cases
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Brown v. Board of Education
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Rasul v. Bush
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Maine v. Taylor
- New York v. United States
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Marbury v. Madison
- United States v. Darby
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Clinton v. Jones
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Honig v. Doe
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- United States v. Lopez
- Morrison v. Olson
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- United States v. Virginia