L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Champion v. Ames
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Loving v. Virginia
- New York v. United States
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Civil Rights Cases
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Korematsu v. United States
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- South Dakota v. Dole
- INS v. Chadha
- Nixon v. United States
- Washington v. Davis
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Alden v. Maine
- Morrison v. Olson
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Printz v. United States
- Maine v. Taylor
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- United States v. Darby
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Ex Parte Young
- Romer v. Evans
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- United States v. Morrison
- United States v. Windsor
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Honig v. Doe
- Powell v. McCormack
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Ex Parte Milligan
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Texas v. Johnson
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- United States v. Virginia
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- United States v. Lopez
- Miller v. California
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Bush v. Gore
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Baker v. Carr
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Rasul v. Bush
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Marbury v. Madison
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Roe v. Wade
- Reno v. Condon
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Clinton v. Jones
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer