Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Jeudi 30 Avril 2026 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- INS v. Chadha
- Texas v. Johnson
- Nixon v. United States
- Rasul v. Bush
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- New York v. United States
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- Reno v. Condon
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Washington v. Davis
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Miller v. California
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Powell v. McCormack
- United States v. Lopez
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Wickard v. Filburn
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Romer v. Evans
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- United States v. Darby
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Baker v. Carr
- Champion v. Ames
- United States v. Morrison
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- United States v. Windsor
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Ex Parte Young
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Korematsu v. United States
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Clinton v. Jones
- Morrison v. Olson
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Roe v. Wade
- Maine v. Taylor
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Alden v. Maine
- Shelby County v. Holder
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Honig v. Doe
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Brown v. Board of Education
- United States v. Virginia
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Bush v. Gore
- Marbury v. Madison
- Printz v. United States
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Civil Rights Cases
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Loving v. Virginia
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
