Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Vendredi 5 Décembre 2025 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Hans v. Louisiana
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Ex Parte Milligan
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- United States v. Morrison
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Champion v. Ames
- Civil Rights Cases
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Ex Parte Young
- Morrison v. Olson
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- United States v. Lopez
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- United States v. Virginia
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Powell v. McCormack
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- McCullen v. Coakley
- New York v. United States
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Texas v. Johnson
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Roe v. Wade
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- United States v. Darby
- Korematsu v. United States
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Nixon v. United States
- Washington v. Davis
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Loving v. Virginia
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Miller v. California
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Rasul v. Bush
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Marbury v. Madison
- Clinton v. Jones
- Alden v. Maine
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Brown v. Board of Education
- United States v. Windsor
- Printz v. United States
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Honig v. Doe
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- Stafford v. Wallace
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- INS v. Chadha
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Romer v. Evans
- Reno v. Condon
- Maine v. Taylor
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Baker v. Carr
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Bush v. Gore
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
