Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Mardi 17 Mars 2026 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Morrison v. Olson
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- New York v. United States
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Romer v. Evans
- Miller v. California
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Powell v. McCormack
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Texas v. Johnson
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Ex Parte Young
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Marbury v. Madison
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Washington v. Davis
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- United States v. Morrison
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Roe v. Wade
- INS v. Chadha
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- United States v. Windsor
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Clinton v. Jones
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Loving v. Virginia
- United States v. Lopez
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Reno v. Condon
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Champion v. Ames
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Nixon v. United States
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Civil Rights Cases
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Maine v. Taylor
- Ex Parte Milligan
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Korematsu v. United States
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Printz v. United States
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Bush v. Gore
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- United States v. Darby
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Honig v. Doe
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- Rasul v. Bush
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- United States v. Virginia
- Alden v. Maine
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Baker v. Carr
