Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Samedi 31 Janvier 2026 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Cooper v. Aaron
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Bush v. Gore
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Miller v. California
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Honig v. Doe
- Ex Parte Quirin
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- United States v. Lopez
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Ex Parte Young
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Washington v. Davis
- Civil Rights Cases
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- United States v. Morrison
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Baker v. Carr
- South Dakota v. Dole
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Texas v. Johnson
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- Korematsu v. United States
- Rasul v. Bush
- Maine v. Taylor
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Romer v. Evans
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Ex Parte McCardle
- New York v. United States
- Shelby County v. Holder
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Powell v. McCormack
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Printz v. United States
- Champion v. Ames
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Wickard v. Filburn
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- INS v. Chadha
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Morrison v. Olson
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- United States v. Windsor
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- United States v. Darby
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- Marbury v. Madison
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Nixon v. United States
- Roe v. Wade
- Loving v. Virginia
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Alden v. Maine
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- United States v. Virginia
- Clinton v. Jones
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Reno v. Condon
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Bowers v. Hardwick
