Informations sur l'album Genius Casebook: Con Law de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Samedi 1 Août 2026 est sorti le nouvel album de Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appelé Genius Casebook: Con Law.
L'album se compose de 111 chansons. Vous pouvez cliquer sur les chansons pour visualiser les respectifs paroles et
Voici une petite liste de chansons que Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg pourrait décider de chanter, y compris l'album dont chaque chanson est tirée:
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- New York v. United States
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Washington v. Davis
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Texas v. Johnson
- INS v. Chadha
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Powell v. McCormack
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- United States v. Windsor
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Roe v. Wade
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Loving v. Virginia
- Morrison v. Olson
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Miller v. California
- Maine v. Taylor
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- Champion v. Ames
- Alden v. Maine
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Snyder v. Phelps
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Rasul v. Bush
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- United States v. Lopez
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Marbury v. Madison
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Baker v. Carr
- Korematsu v. United States
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- Clinton v. Jones
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Romer v. Evans
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Nixon v. United States
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Civil Rights Cases
- Printz v. United States
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Honig v. Doe
- United States v. Virginia
- Ex Parte Young
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Gonzales v. Raich
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Bush v. Gore
- United States v. Darby
- United States v. Morrison
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Reno v. Condon
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Shelby County v. Holder
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Ex Parte Quirin
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
